Frontier Publications
- Google itFirm strategy in communication device, platform and application integrationBulletin | 18.11.2011.
- Thinking outside the box: calculating damagesReflections on major cartel cases in AustraliaBulletin | 27.04.2011.
- Where convergence exposes divergenceImplications of convergence on broadcast licensingBulletin | 06.04.2011.
- Green is GoodClimate Institute study on clean energy jobsBulletin | 03.03.2011.
- Blurring the distinction between carbon costs and pricesBulletin | 08.12.2010.
- What’s the cost of carbon uncertainty?The impact of delayed investment in the power sectorBulletin | 08.11.2010.
- Third time luckyMobile termination regulation in New ZealandBulletin | 17.09.2010.
- Keep 'em un-coordinatedCoordinated effects in mergersBulletin | 19.08.2010.
- The times, they’re a changin’Using economics to adapt to climate changeBulletin | 11.08.2010.
- Economic Analysis of the RSPTWith a postscript on the negotiated outcomePaper | 05.07.2010.
Phone a friend
The potential for mobile networks to use differential call charges as a means of foreclosureIn many countries mobile-to-mobile (M2M) access charges are set above cost; and the price of mobile phone calls to subscribers on different mobile networks ("off-net" calls) is higher than calls to other subscribers on the same network ("on-net" calls). This raises questions about the incentives on mobile network operators (MNOs) in setting M2M access charges and the relative position of large and small networks. Frontier's modelling work challenges the regulatory view that large operators may use high charges to foreclose their competitors.
frontier bulletin - phone a friend.pdf |


frontier bulletin - phone a friend.pdf

