Frontier Veröffentlichungen
- Scorched earthCoping with hosepipe bansBulletin | 05.04.2012.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA report prepared for Ofgem | 19.03.2012.
- Present values - the economics of ChristmasBulletin | 14.12.2011.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA consultation document prepared for OfgemPräsentation | 23.11.2011.
- The price is wrongTHE COST OF ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM IN BRITAINBulletin | 18.10.2011.
- The way to RIIOUSING OUTPUTS IN UK ENERGY NETWORK REGULATIONBulletin | 18.10.2011.
- Pressing the switches Increasing competition in retail bankingBulletin | 05.10.2011.
- Connecting for growthThe role of Britain's hub airport in economic recovery | 22.09.2011.
- English Premium League – Frontier Economics bulletinWhy clubs pay more for English footballersBulletin | 08.09.2011.
- War and peaceThe economic cost of a return to conflict in SudanBulletin | 07.07.2011.
Utility benchmarking
How to ask the right question?Utility benchmarking as part of the tariff setting process is receiving increasing attention throughout Europe. Critics of utility benchmarking point to different regulators using different benchmarking techniques and different model specifications that consequently produce differing results. Critics argue that this is an indication of benchmarking being unreliable.
In a new publication in the German Energy Economics Journal (ZfE), Dr Christoph Riechmann, Director in the Frontier Energy Practice in Cologne and London and Dr Aria Rodgarkia-Dara from the Austrian energy regulator, E-Control, show that different models have evolved, because different regulators are under legal obligations to explore different regulatory questions. Each question requires a specific benchmarking approach.
Frontier paper - Regulatorisches Benchmarking.pdf |


Frontier paper - Regulatorisches Benchmarking.pdf



