Frontier Publications
- Keep 'em un-coordinatedCoordinated effects in mergersBulletin | 19.08.2010.
- The times, they’re a changin’Using economics to adapt to climate changeBulletin | 11.08.2010.
- Taking the strain Risk-sharing in UK rail frachisingBulletin | 01.08.2010.
- Necessary inventionsEconomic policies to increas low-carbon innovationBulletin | 15.07.2010.
- Economic Analysis of the RSPTWith a postscript on the negotiated outcomePaper | 05.07.2010.
- Not patently obviousHolders of patents and the Australian Trade Practices ActBulletin | 30.06.2010.
- Shelf lifeUsing promotions effectivelyBulletin | 10.06.2010.
- RPI-X@20: Output measures in the future regulatory frameworkA report prepared for OfgemPaper | 31.05.2010.
- RPI-X@20: The future role of benchmarking in regulatory reviewsA final report prepared for OfgemPaper | 31.05.2010.
- Public competitionThe choices facing the UK government after the electionBulletin | 29.04.2010.
What's the damage?
Measuring harm from exclusionary practicesIn Europe, it has become increasingly common for claimants to follow competition law infringement decisions by the European Commission (EC) - or a national competition authority - with private actions for damages in national courts. But these decisions do not automatically write customers or competitors a cheque. Anxious to help claimants achieve compensation, the EC has opened up a debate, in which Frontier Economics has participated, over the obstacles to private litigation.
 Frontier bulletin - Whats the damage.pdf |
 Printer friendly |