Publicaciones
- Scorched earthCoping with hosepipe bansBoletín | 05.04.2012.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA report prepared for Ofgem | 19.03.2012.
- Present values - the economics of ChristmasBoletín | 14.12.2011.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA consultation document prepared for OfgemPresentación | 23.11.2011.
- The price is wrongTHE COST OF ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM IN BRITAINBoletín | 18.10.2011.
- The way to RIIOUSING OUTPUTS IN UK ENERGY NETWORK REGULATIONBoletín | 18.10.2011.
- Pressing the switches Increasing competition in retail bankingBoletín | 05.10.2011.
- Connecting for growthThe role of Britain's hub airport in economic recovery | 22.09.2011.
- English Premium League – Frontier Economics bulletinWhy clubs pay more for English footballersBoletín | 08.09.2011.
- War and peaceThe economic cost of a return to conflict in SudanBoletín | 07.07.2011.
Not patently obvious
Holders of patents and the Australian Trade Practices ActMany holders of patents (and some intellectual property lawyers) do not realise that the exercise of patent rights is constrained by the provisions of the Australian Trade Practices Act 1974. In particular, the monopolisation section of the Act (section 46) may well be infringed if the holder of a patent refuses to grant a licence to a party that requests one. In this bulletin, Frontier (Australia) looks at how economic analysis can play a vital role in a court’s decision in such cases.
Frontier bulletin - Not patently obvious.pdf |


Frontier bulletin - Not patently obvious.pdf



