Publicaciones
- Scorched earthCoping with hosepipe bansBoletín | 05.04.2012.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA report prepared for Ofgem | 19.03.2012.
- Present values - the economics of ChristmasBoletín | 14.12.2011.
- A framework for the evaluation of smart gridsA consultation document prepared for OfgemPresentación | 23.11.2011.
- The price is wrongTHE COST OF ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM IN BRITAINBoletín | 18.10.2011.
- The way to RIIOUSING OUTPUTS IN UK ENERGY NETWORK REGULATIONBoletín | 18.10.2011.
- Pressing the switches Increasing competition in retail bankingBoletín | 05.10.2011.
- Connecting for growthThe role of Britain's hub airport in economic recovery | 22.09.2011.
- English Premium League – Frontier Economics bulletinWhy clubs pay more for English footballersBoletín | 08.09.2011.
- War and peaceThe economic cost of a return to conflict in SudanBoletín | 07.07.2011.
On-net/ off-net differentials
Dan ElliottIt is becoming received wisdom amongst telecoms regulators that large mobile operators can use high off-net and low on-net pricing to protect themselves from competition from smaller rivals. It is odd that such a view is gaining currency, because there is little support for it from the academic literature on network pricing. Furthermore, it is not even clear that historically it has been the large rather than the small networks that have introduced these differentials. In this note we examine the arguments and try to explain in simple terms why on-net/off-net differentials and high M2M call termination charges do not obviously act to the advantage of larger networks as has been claimed.
frontier paper - on- and off-net differentials - mar04.pdf |


frontier paper - on- and off-net differentials - mar04.pdf



